Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta Nefertiti. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta Nefertiti. Mostrar todas las entradas

sábado, 16 de febrero de 2008

Nefertiti's Eyes

Did the queen's distinctive feature become a symbol of Egyptian royalty?

Below: Coffin F is one of three from KV63, an embalmer's cache from around the time of Tutankhamun, that shows faces with eyes shaped similarly to Nefertiti's. (Heather Alexander/Amenmesse Project)

All eyes were on the Valley of the Kings the morning of February 5, 2006, when our expedition first looked into the chamber now known as KV63, the first tomb found in Egypt's Valley of the Kings since that of Tutankhamun (KV62) in 1922.

Press speculation was rampant over what the tomb might hold. Would our expedition find the mummies of royal women from the late 18th Dynasty, such as Queen Nefertiti, thought by some to be Tut's mother? Or the six princesses she bore to the pharaoh Akhenaten, including Tut's queen, Ankhesenamun? The mummies of these women have either not been found or identified. Perhaps they were removed from Akhenaten's capital at Amarna when a later king, presumably Tut, returned to the traditional capital of Thebes on the Nile opposite the Valley of the Kings. Did Tut rebury them in the Valley?

After taking out several stones blocking the doorway from the tomb shaft into the chamber, we peered through the narrow opening. Inside, we could see many large ceramic jars and several wooden coffins, some with yellow-painted faces. The press speculation was incorrect on all counts. We found no mummies in any of the tomb's seven coffins and no inscriptions to tell us for whom these coffins were initially intended.

But while studying the coffins, I discovered--in the eyes of faces painted on three of them--an intriguing link to Nefertiti, the queen whose name means, simply, "the beautiful one has come." While none of the coffins held Nefertiti's remains, the eyes may tell us something unexpected about her celebrated beauty. Was it in part the result of a genetic syndrome?

If not a royal tomb, what was KV63? Finds include the seven coffins, a small gilt coffinette, two large alabaster vessels, floral garlands, pillows, natron (the natural salt used in mummification), and many ceramics. It seems to have been a cache of material used by embalmers, but including coffins, unused or salvaged from disturbed burials, suitable for upper-class, but not elite or royal, funerals.

Although KV63 didn't yield the mummies of Nefertiti, Ankhesenamun, and the rest, the tomb is linked to Tutankhamun's time. Seal impressions found there match some discovered in Tut's tomb, which is just 50 feet away. KV63's date should fall within or close to Tut's reign (1343-1333 B.C.), but association with his burial is uncertain at this point. Perhaps we will gain further evidence for the date of KV63 from the contents of the remaining 16, of 28 total, storage jars that we plan to open this season.

Otto Schaden, our expedition director, asked me, as staff art historian and object analyst, if any information could be gleaned from the coffins to narrow this date range. I began with the four coffins that had yellow-painted faces. The KV63 coffins were almost totally destroyed by termites, but the faces were made separately. Faces on coffins were often covered with thin plaster or gesso as a base for gilding or painting (as in the KV63 coffins). The termites seem to prefer untreated wood, so while the remainder of the coffins were mostly consumed, the gessoed and painted faces survived.

In the art of the ancient Near East, including Egypt, females were generally depicted with lighter skin than males. Were the coffins with light yellow faces made for women? Two such coffins in museum collections, however, were inscribed for males. Furthermore, a painting in a tomb in Thebes shows coffins of Nebamun and Ipuky, sculptors who worked during the reigns of kings Amenhotep III and his son Akhenaten. Each of their black coffins has a yellow-painted face. So rather than indicating the coffins were for females, the yellow faces probably copied those of the very wealthy, who could afford gold faces on their coffins.

With no inscriptions and the ambiguous nature of the yellow face color, I began looking at other characteristics that might prove helpful, such as the shape and details of the faces. In doing that, the eyes on three of the painted KV63 coffins brought me back to Nefertiti.

Nefertiti is best known from the painted bust of her found at Amarna and now in Berlin. Her parentage is not entirely certain, but most Egyptologists believe she was the daughter of the powerful courtier Ay, who eventually succeeded Tutankhamun.

The face of one, which we designated coffin A, had eyes rimmed with blue glass in a traditional shape, unlike the other three coffins with yellow faces, designated B, F, and G. What links the eyes of these three coffins, beside the fact that all are painted, is that the inner canthus--the corner of the eye near the nose--descends abruptly and abuts the upper lid, giving them an East Asian appearance. Nefertiti's famous bust illustrates this eye shape better than words. Both her proper right eye and the empty socket of the left show this form. What is the meaning of this eye shape?

Art of the Amarna period, when Akhenaten and Nefertiti reigned, is noted for its naturalistic depiction of plants and animals and, in some cases, candid scenes of daily life. So one might suggest that the shape of Nefertiti's eyes may be an attempt to render her features as they actually appeared.

One of the earliest appearances of Nefertiti's unusual eye shape is on a stela showing the royal family. Found at Amarna and now in Berlin, it is dated by an inscription to before years 8 through 12 of Akhenaten's reign, or around 1350 B.C. On the stela, however, Akhenaten's eye shape is "normal" and resembles those seen on sculptures of him in Thebes, but Nefertiti's is not. So this stela may show a real, physical condition.

It could be that Nefertiti had an epicanthic fold, a piece of skin from the upper eyelid covering the inner edge of the eye. This feature is found not just in people of East Asian descent, but also in individuals with a number of different syndromes--groups of symptoms characteristic of an abnormality--some of which are genetically based. Some syndromes are debilitating, others less so, and still others are passed only from mothers to daughters. We are currently investigating the possibility that Nefertiti's eyes reflect such an underlying physical condition, but without her remains no diagnosis can be made (and the evidence may have been destroyed or altered during mummification).

If a genetically based physical trait was the basis for this eye shape, did Nefertiti pass it on to her children and was it recorded in the appearance of their eyes in artwork? Images of Nefertiti show the trait more frequently and markedly than those of any other individual portrayed at Amarna. German excavators at Amarna in 1912 found many representations of Nefertiti and her daughters in the studio of an artist named Tuthmosis, including the painted bust of Nefertiti. Many of these representations are in various stages of completion, but their distinctive eyes are easily noticed. This is especially clear in a relief, now in the Brooklyn Museum, that may show Meritaten, the queen's eldest daughter.

It is possible that Nefertiti was Tutankhamun's mother. If so, it wouldn't be surprising if he were shown with an eye shape similar to hers. This is the case with some depictions, such as a wooden head of the young pharaoh that was found in his tomb. It shows his head, sprouting from a lotus bloom, with eyes that match those of Nefertiti. Other explanations for its appearance with Tut include the possibility that his mother was not Nefertiti but perhaps a woman of the extended royal family who also carried the trait. And it could even be that Tut did not have the eye shape himself, if his mother was a woman other than Nefertiti who did not have it or if the trait was passed only from mothers to daughters. In either case, Tut could be shown with it simply as an artistic continuance of the characteristic.

If the sculptor Tuthmosis were responsible for recording and then re-creating this eye shape, perhaps he extended its use from those who actually had it to--as an artistic convention--a "royal marker" to distinguish images of the king and a few select nobles. For example, this eye shape is also seen on a representation of King Amenhotep III, Akhenaten's father, seated in a relaxed pose with his wife Queen Tiy on a stela found at Amarna, and now in the British Museum. Amenhotep III was Nefertiti's father-in-law, but this stela was probably carved after his death, so the eye shape does not predate its appearance on Nefertiti. It is also used in the 19th Dynasty, such as in depictions of the pharaoh Seti I at Abydos and of Nefertari, queen of Rameses II, who died around 1254 B.C.

And this brings us back to KV63, with its upper-class coffins. Like the yellow faces meant to represent gilding, did the eye shape seek to portray a "royal marker" derived from Nefertiti's own eyes?

The final word is not yet in, but there seems to be a high probability that Nefertiti herself had eyes with epicanthic folds or eyes with a similar shape with descending inner canthi. Eyes of this type undoubtedly created what must have been quite a striking feature to all who saw her. This may have been passed along to some of her royal offspring. Moreover, in the sun cult that they fostered, both Nefertiti and her husband Akhenaten were the only ones through whom prayers could be directed to the solar god Aten. This divine or semi-divine status may have accounted for this eye shape being transformed into an artistic convention that was copied by high-ranking officials and subsequent rulers.

martes, 17 de julio de 2007

CT Scanner Reveals Mysteries inside Nefertiti Bust

The bust of Nefertiti stored at Berlin’s Altes Museum, is one of the most renowned works of ancient Egyptian sculpture. Fifteen years ago, a computed tomography (CT) scan of the bust revealed that a second structure was hidden inside. This structure was presumed to be a cast of the subject’s face, but the image resolution was too poor to be conclusive. With recent advances in CT scanning, researchers called for a repeat scan to document the structure within the bust. Results of the scan are included in a National Geographic Channel special that will premiere tonight.

viernes, 18 de mayo de 2007

Nefertiti II

See also this post

"The facial trauma found on a certain mummy known as the "young lady", one of three discovered in the tomb of Amenhotep II (KV35) in the Valley of the Kings, was used by Joann Fletcher as the main evidence for the damage being caused by malice and perpetrated post-mortem, in revenge against Queen Nefertiti. This conclusion does not make any sense, because anyone who wanted to take revenge on the mummy of Nefertiti could damage the entire mummy rather than make this small cut on the face. However, there is new evidence from the CT scan performed on the mummy to suggest that the trauma to the left cheek of the young lady's face was almost certainly done post-mortem, occurring before the embalming process.

The evidence cited for the post-mortem trauma was: first that the bone, skin, and muscle fragments were pushed inwards, down into the wound and not outwards (as would happen if the mask had been ripped off the face). Ashraf Selim, professor of radiology in the Faculty of Medicine at Cairo University, says it would be impossible to push the dry, embalmed tissues down and have them maintain their integrity without being broken off, suggesting that this happened before the body was embalmed. Second, the wound was cleaned and there were no loose bone or flesh fragments within the cavity, as one would expect if the wound occurred after embalming. Third, there were bony fragments deep within the nasal cavity beneath the layer of resin, implying that the fracture had happened before embalming. Fourth, the violence of the wound made it seem unlikely that it was committed by the embalmers. Paul Gustorer, another radiologist, suggested that this trauma was very similar to a wound that he had seen on a patient who had been kicked in the face by a horse.

Victor Loret, who discovered the mummies in the tomb of Amenhotep II (KV35) in 1898, also found a wig in the tomb lying near the mummies. Fletcher located this wig in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo. It is in the Nubian style which, according to Fletcher, was worn by Nefertiti. However, there is no evidence to connect the wig with the "young lady" just because it was found in the same tomb. It is also important to remember that Nefertiti was not the only royal woman of Amarna to wear the Nubian wig. There is also evidence that Kiya, the mother of Tutankhamun, wore the wig.

Concerning the double piercing on the left ear of the young lady, Fletcher stated that this double piercing occurred only in depictions of Nefertiti and one of her daughters, and not on other females. The mummy does indeed have a double piercing in her left ear. However, she is not the only known mummy to have a double piercing. For example, it also occurs on the mummy of Thuya, mother of Queen Tiye.

Fletcher also stated that the finds associated with the embalming of the mummy showed evidence that the mummy dated to the 18th Dynasty. The presence of what appeared to be nefer beads was noticed on the X-ray; these were used on necklaces in a later part of the 18th Dynasty. In the report on the mummy, we also noted that the mummification style was very different from that of King Tut.

Concerning Fletcher's main point, that she has found the missing right arm and that this arm was flexed in the royal position of a king, the CT scan showed that both arms were actually extended beside the body and that the right arm had two breaks, one in the upper arm and one at the wrist. The flexed right arm was completely separated from the body, and Selim said that it definitely did not belong to that mummy.

The CT scan confirmed that the mummy known as the "young lady" was a female and not a male as previously suggested. Fletcher also concluded that the young lady was 30 years old. The CT scan concluded that the mummy was actually between 25 and 35 years of age. The last two points of evidence are similar, but all the other evidence suggests that this mummy cannot be Queen Nefertiti. In this respect, we must close this subject and begin to make further studies to identify our "young lady"."

Source

lunes, 7 de mayo de 2007

Row over Nefertiti bust continues

And now it went fron internal Egyptology to BBC News.



Bust of Queen Nefertiti
The bust was unearthed by a German in 1912

She was rumoured to be the world's most beautiful woman in her time.

Nefertiti, Queen of Egypt, was the co-ruler of her country in the 14th Century BC. Today, the bust of Nefertiti (whose name literally means "a beautiful woman has arrived") has pride of place in the Antiquities collection in Berlin's Altes Museum.

Her face features on postcards of the city and each year, thousands of visitors flock to the museum to admire the ancient treasure.

But, once again, the bust of Nefertiti is the subject of a heated debate, as it appears the Egyptians want it back.

The head of the Supreme Council of Antiquities in Egypt, Zahi Hawass, recently said the Egyptian Foreign Ministry would send letters to Germany requesting that the treasure should be loaned temporarily to Egypt.

This latest announcement has opened a can of worms as the German government has refused to give it back.

'German property'

The bust of Nefertiti was unearthed at Amarna in Egypt by a German archaeologist, Ludwig Borchardt, in December 1912. It's thought the bust was made around 1350BC.

Back in 1912, the excavation was financed by a Berlin philanthropist, James Simon. Nefertiti's bust was then taken to Germany under the terms of an agreement reached in 1913.

According to both museum officials and the German government, it is definitely German property. The treasure has been on public display in Berlin since 1923.

It is an enormous risk to let her travel. We could never be certain that she would arrive in good health
Dietrich Wildung
Curator, Berlin Egyptian Museum

"Nefertiti's face is an icon of beauty, and the bust is the ultimate symbol of female beauty," says Dietrich Wildung, the curator of Berlin's Egyptian Museum.

"But it is an enormous risk to let her travel. We could never be certain that she would arrive in good health. There are serious conservation issues. The bust is made of limestone and thick layers of plaster and it's very sensitive to vibrations, shock, and any change of temperature," he said.

The German Culture Minister, Bernd Neumann, has also supported the position of museum officials. Mr Neumann said the bust of Nefertiti was too fragile to travel and he reiterated "that there were no doubts about the legal ownership of the priceless artefact.

Bust of Queen Nefertiti and visitors
The museum says the bust is too fragile too travel

"Experts have reservations about taking Nefertiti on a long trip, and we have to take these concerns seriously," said Mr Neumann in a statement.

Bizarrely enough, a campaign has now been launched in Germany called "Nefertiti Travels".

The new initiative was launched by a cultural association based in Hamburg, CulturCooperation.

They have written an open letter to the German Culture Minister, Bernd Neumann, urging him to offer the statue to Egypt on loan.

I think Egyptians should have the chance to see the bust of Nefertiti in Egypt
Alexander Schudy, Berlin Network for Development Co-operation

"For the last 95 years, Berlin has insisted that the ownership of Nefertiti's bust is legally perfectly clear," says CulturCooperation's Lena Blosat.

"The Germans claim that Nefertiti has become an integral part of our cultural identity here in Germany, which we are not prepared to part with. And the Egyptians say she is our Egyptian Queen and thus part of our culture.

"Today, even allowing the bust to be exhibited in Egypt for three months is an issue which museum directors are obviously not willing to discuss," she said.

Campaigners have distributed postcards depicting the bust of Nefertiti with the words "Return to Sender."

'Best ambassador'

"I think Egyptians should have the chance to see the bust of Nefertiti in Egypt. They shouldn't have to travel all the way to Germany to admire their country's cultural assets," says Alexander Schudy, who works for a group called the Berlin Network for Development Co-operation.

"Nefertiti is not a unique case. There are many works of art in Germany which have a dubious past, and it's about time that we address this topic so that we can have a fair and honest debate," he says.

But museum officials are adamant that the bust of Nefertiti will not return to Egypt.

"I think Nefertiti is the best ambassador of Egypt. She is accepted here, although she is still unique and different. She must stay in Germany," says Dr Wildung, the curator of the Egyptian Museum.

As I stand and admire the bust of Queen Nefertiti, wearing her distinctive blue crown, I am struck by her enigmatic smile. I wonder what she would have made of all this fuss.

Source

viernes, 4 de mayo de 2007

More Nefertiti

This article is from Al-Ahram and written by Zahi Hawass, a leading figure in Egypt regarding Egyptological matters. The photo of the mentioned mummy wasn't in the article so i added it (image 1) myself. Interesting is that there was also a mummy (image 2)called "The Elder Woman". Hair from her was found in Tutankamun's tomb. There seemed to have been a family relationship between the two so it was claimed she was Queen Tiye who was Tutankhamun's grandmother. Only one problem the mummy is too young to be Tiye. And now the question i wonder and has not been investigated. Can it be Ankhesenamun, Tutankhamun's half-sister and wife? That would be a find!














"When I was conducting the CT scan on the mummy of Tutankhamun in the Valley of the Kings in 2005, I thought I would take the opportunity to scan all the unidentified mummies in the valley.

Three mummies are located in the tomb of Amenhotep II (KV 35). Scholars have differing opinions concerning the identities of these mummies, but one in particular was the star of the media over the past three years. A CT scan was taken of it; this, which essentially goes inside the mummy and captures approximately 1,700 images. The British archaeologist Joann Fletcher identified it as Queen Nefertiti. The CT scan of this mummy was studied by Ashraf Selim, professor of radiology in the Faculty of Medicine at Cairo University. Recently, Brando Quicili made a new film about Nefertiti for National Geographic. This film was intended to uncover the real facts behind the most famous queen of Egypt. Abbie Harper was also enthusiastic to present all the evidence cited by Fletcher in the Discovery Channel film and also what has been written about the famous Egyptian queen.

Now, it is time to present the evidence that we have discovered from the study of the CT scan, which will prove that the younger lady discovered in KV 35 cannot be Nefertiti. The principal piece of evidence that Fletcher used in her identification was to match the disarticulated "bent royal arm" (the one which lies at the mummy's feet) with the body. She claimed that this disarticulated forearm with its clenched fist, found amongst the wrappings, was the arm that belonged to the mummy. Her evidence was based on the straight right arm, found lying beside the body, which was "too long". Also, the bone density was different from the attached left arm, whereas the bone density of the royal forearm was more similar. Furthermore, she used the bent right arm and not the left as evidence that it wasn't "Nefertiti" but it was in fact the Pharaoh Smenkhare. She offered no suggestions as to why only the forearm was found, and not the complete arm.

However, the radiologists could more accurately measure the dimensions of both disarticulated arms from the new CT scan. They discovered that, in fact, the straight arm was almost exactly the same length as the attached left arm, whereas the royal forearm was somewhat shorter. They also explained that the probable reason why Fletcher had assumed the straight arm was too long was that she had not taken into account the gap left by the fracture in the upper right arm. Once this gap was subtracted, the total length of the right arm is the same as the attached left arm. The radiologists also found that there was practically no difference in the bone density of the straight arm and the attached arm.

Fletcher also suggested that the facial trauma to the mummy was caused through malice and occurred post-mortem, which is evidence of the hatred felt towards Nefertiti. Other members of Fletcher's team suggested that the trauma could be pre- mortem but this was not really explained or confirmed by them. However, the CT scan study indicated that the trauma to the left cheek was almost certainly post-mortem, and definitely occurred before embalming.

The evidence introduced by the CT scan concluded that this mummy was, therefore, almost certainly not a royal mummy of a queen, although she could have been a princess. The mummy was therefore unlikely to be Nefertiti."

Source

jueves, 19 de abril de 2007

Egypt Vows 'Scientific War' If Germany Doesn't Loan Nefertiti

Hasn't she already done enough in her own time?

"In an escalating conflict over a famous 3,400-year-old bust of Queen Nefertiti, the head of Egypt's antiquities authority has threatened to ban exhibitions and tours of Egyptian artifacts from Germany.

Zahi Hawass, Secretary General of Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities, had requested the sculpture for a temporary exhibition. But German officials say the iconic artwork is too fragile to travel.

Upping the ante, Hawass on Sunday told his country's parliament that he "will never again organize antiquities exhibitions in Germany if it refuses a request, to be issued next week, to allow the bust of Nefertiti to be displayed in Egypt for three months."

(Hawass is also an explorer-in-residence with the National Geographic Society, which owns National Geographic News.)

The painted limestone likeness of Egypt's most famous queen has been in Germany since 1913, a year after it was discovered by a German archaeological team at an ancient sculpture workshop at Tell el 'Amârna, about 150 miles (240 kilometers) south of Cairo.

From her perch in Berlin, Nefertiti became one of the most admired, and most copied, images from ancient Egypt. The bust plays a prominent role in the marketing of the German capital's formidable array of museums.

Nefertiti was the wife of Pharaoh Amenhotep IV, who was later known as Akhenaten. Akhenaten roiled ancient Egyptian society in the 13th century B.C. by casting aside the pharaonic pantheon of gods in favor of a single sun deity. The old religion was restored after his death.

Raiders of the Lost Art?

While Egypt has periodically sought the return of the bust, "this vehemence is a new stage," said Dietrich Schulenburg, a spokesperson for Bernd Neumann, Germany's Minister of State for Culture.

German antiquities experts have determined the statue is too fragile to make the 3,000-mile (4,828-kilometer) trip to Cairo, Neumann said in a statement released April 13.

"To lend the Nefertiti bust would be irresponsible," the German culture minister said.

Source

sábado, 14 de abril de 2007

Nefertiti Is Too Fragile to Visit Egypt, German Minister Says

One of the most beautiful and famous busts from Ancient Egypt.

"Queen Nefertiti's bust, a symbol of female power and beauty that has survived more than three millennia, is too fragile to leave Berlin for a trip to Egypt, German Culture Minister Bernd Neumann said.

Neumann rejected a campaign by a Hamburg-based lobby group demanding the loan of Nefertiti to Egypt. CulturCooperation e.V., partly funded by the European Union, says Egypt has been requesting the return of the regal bust for more than 90 years, most recently just for temporary exhibition.

``Experts are of the view that there are serious conservation and restoration concerns that argue against any long-distance transportation of Nefertiti,'' Neumann said in a statement today. He added that in general, such cultural exchanges are welcome.

The painted limestone bust dates from the 14th century B.C. and is 50 centimeters tall. It is housed in Berlin's Altes Museum on Museum Island and is considered one of the German capital's most important ancient treasures. It was unearthed by a German archaeologist in 1912 and formed part of a gift of 5,000 objects made to Berlin museums by the philanthropist James Simon in 1920.

``We haven't officially requested the return,'' said Mahmoud Gaafar, a spokesman for the Egyptian Embassy in Berlin. ``Obviously that is not to deny the fact that she is Egyptian.''

Treasures

Lena Blosat, a spokeswoman for CulturCooperation, said the group is of the opinion that Egyptian requests for a loan of the bust are justified. No one disputes Berlin's legal right to ownership of the treasure, she said.

CulturCooperation, a non-profit organization founded in 1986, supports contemporary art projects and campaigns for a fairer cultural exchange between European nations and countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America whose treasures were plundered by colonial powers. The group has funding from the European Commission, the executive arm of the EU.

The campaign Web site includes a debating forum and invites visitors to vote on whether Nefertiti should be allowed to travel, should return to Egypt permanently, or should remain in Berlin. The campaign will also include an event in Berlin's regional parliament, supported by the Green Party, on May 22, Blosat said."

Source

jueves, 29 de marzo de 2007

...iti in the name

A follow up on names of Egyptian queens:

Nefertari






















Nefertiti






















Gatiti (our cat Blacky)